Hi Keith – thanks so much for your insight and interesting perspective on these fungi! Bert.
I find these polypores confusing, & fail to see how they can be accurately identified. Once known as Piptoporus Cretaceus, I am now told that-one of them at least-is in fact Ryvardenia Cretacia. However, Lietiporus Cretacius is very similar, the only difference I can see is the wavy shape on the edge of the latter.
Both I believe are Tinder Fungus, so to me the name is not as important as the use it can be put to. I use it in flint & steel fire lighting (18th century, NOT Ferocerium Rod !!!)
Regards, Keith. http://woodsrunnersdiary.blogspot.com.au/2012/02/part-four-closer-look-at-flint-steel.html
Hi Keith – thanks so much for your insight and interesting perspective on these fungi! Bert.
I find these polypores confusing, & fail to see how they can be accurately identified. Once known as Piptoporus Cretaceus, I am now told that-one of them at least-is in fact Ryvardenia Cretacia. However, Lietiporus Cretacius is very similar, the only difference I can see is the wavy shape on the edge of the latter.
Both I believe are Tinder Fungus, so to me the name is not as important as the use it can be put to. I use it in flint & steel fire lighting (18th century, NOT Ferocerium Rod !!!)
Regards, Keith.
http://woodsrunnersdiary.blogspot.com.au/2012/02/part-four-closer-look-at-flint-steel.html